<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>ACDSee Forums Topic: Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless.</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</link>
<description>ACDSee Forums Topic: Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless.</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:47:11 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>John Radcliffe on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless/page/2#post-29546</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>John Radcliffe</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29546@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;(1) Does this make any sense?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Intel GMA X3100&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Accelerator in Use: Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;And apparently I have DivX 9.0&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;(2) It happened once over the weekend, this time without Random mode being selected. However, I was also able to run through all the images in the folder successfully (in batches), so that would seem to rule out the problem being caused by either Random mode or a particular image or image type (although most are .jpg, there are a few .bmp .gif .png and .wmf images in that folder).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So I guess it's down to a combination of factors.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;(3) I also note that slideshow doesn't handle header or footer text correctly, and wraps the text on to a second line, but doesn't do the same with the background. So if &#60;span style=&#34;text-decoration: underline;&#34;&#62;[&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; &#38;nbsp;]&#60;/span&#62;&#38;nbsp;indicates the background, I&#38;nbsp;would get something like this:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;span style=&#34;text-decoration: underline;&#34;&#62;[This is the Caption&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; &#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;]&#60;/span&#62;&#60;br /&#62;text of the image&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Where I'd guess that the background is long enough for the entire text, but the text actually starts a new line in the middle, and the second line doesn't have the background. Most odd. (When I compared v2 I remembered that this simply refused to display a background at all.)&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>moongate on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless/page/2#post-29453</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>moongate</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29453@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-29450&#34;&#62;John Radcliffe said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I've now had ACDSee &#34;blue screen&#34; on me twice&#38;nbsp;while running a random slideshow. I can't remember ever having a previous version&#38;nbsp;actually cause a&#38;nbsp;system&#38;nbsp;restart: problems&#38;nbsp;might&#38;nbsp; lead to ACDSee shutting itself down, but not the entire system.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'll try it again at the weekend, but has anyone else had a similar issue?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It seems to happen&#38;nbsp;after about 15 to 20 minutes (i.e. approx 150 to 200 changes), there are about 500 images in the folder, I'm using a single (fade) transition,&#38;nbsp;have&#38;nbsp;a Dell laptop&#38;nbsp;with Windows XP, and I'm using&#38;nbsp;build 335.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What graphics card do you have in your System?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Moongate&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>John Radcliffe on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless/page/2#post-29450</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>John Radcliffe</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29450@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I've now had ACDSee &#34;blue screen&#34; on me twice&#38;nbsp;while running a random slideshow. I can't remember ever having a previous version&#38;nbsp;actually cause a&#38;nbsp;system&#38;nbsp;restart: problems&#38;nbsp;might&#38;nbsp; lead to ACDSee shutting itself down, but not the entire system.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'll try it again at the weekend, but has anyone else had a similar issue?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It seems to happen&#38;nbsp;after about 15 to 20 minutes (i.e. approx 150 to 200 changes), there are about 500 images in the folder, I'm using a single (fade) transition,&#38;nbsp;have&#38;nbsp;a Dell laptop&#38;nbsp;with Windows XP, and I'm using&#38;nbsp;build 335.&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tankred on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless/page/2#post-29322</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Tankred</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29322@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-29313&#34;&#62;kthompson said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;If the module that is removed has unstable code, removing it could make the program more stable overall..&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;True, but this wasn't the case, here.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;blockquote&#62;
&#60;blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Changing the handling of a feature, however, is a regular step in developing a piece of software. Some like these changes, others don't.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;That's why a conscientious company would have their upgrade software / new version, etc install as a separate program and not uninstall or replace the old program.&#38;nbsp; That way the customer would have the ability to compare and see which works best for them.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Agreed. Normally, I wouldn't mind a new version of a program uninstalling the old version during the install procedure. But seeing all the users with several problems, a separate install would have been advantageous. Plus, I really support your idea of having a real update and a full install instead of having the latter, only.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#38;nbsp;&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anonymous on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless/page/2#post-29313</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">29313@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-28925&#34;&#62;Tankred said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;In my optinion, pulling something out of a program doesn't necessarily make the program more stable.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;If the module that is removed has unstable code, removing it could make the program more stable overall..&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#38;nbsp;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Changing the handling of a feature, however, is a regular step in developing a piece of software. Some like these changes, others don't.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;That's why a conscientious company would have their upgrade software / new version, etc install as a separate program and not uninstall or replace the old program.&#38;nbsp; That way the customer would have the ability to compare and see which works best for them.&#38;nbsp; Also means that if you don't turn out a better product than the previous one, or if you remove too much functionality with your new product, people will choose to stay with the old one so the company is more inclined to make sure they put out a good and better product without removing too much functionality so people will keep buying.&#38;nbsp; Good customer service is good for the company as well.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#38;nbsp;&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tankred on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless/page/2#post-28925</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Tankred</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28925@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;In my optinion, pulling something out of a program doesn't necessarily make the program more stable. And I never heard of anything like removing the slideshow feature from the Pro application. Changing the handling of a feature, however, is a regular step in developing a piece of software. Some like these changes, others don't.&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>graydon on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28924</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>graydon</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28924@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Sorry - I wasn't declaring war on the slideshow function... and in fact have only used it once.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The comment to remove it from the core app is based upon reading the forum here... there are many stability issues with Pro that pulling something out of it (like slideshow) might help the overall user base.&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joe on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28917</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28917@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-28915&#34;&#62;BjornB said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-28913&#34;&#62;&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Just curios, why do you want to set it to &#34;0&#34;? If you want to look at the pictures one at the time you will get the same effect by selecting full screen in the viewer.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I want to control the slide show manually. I use the function for scientific and public lectures and would like to use the transition effects of the slide show.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;BTW - the control panel of the slide show in version 2.0 is more useful then in version 2.5.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Joe&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>BjornB on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28915</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>BjornB</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28915@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-28913&#34;&#62;&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Yes, but I cannot type &#34;0 seconds&#34;.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I can use the slide show manually in version 2.0 by switching off this feature.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Just curios, why do you want to set it to &#34;0&#34;? If you want to look at the pictures one at the time you will get the same effect by selecting full screen in the viewer.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Cheers&#60;a href=&#34;http://tyda.se/search?w=curiosity&#34;&#62;&#60;br /&#62;&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joe on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28913</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28913@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-28883&#34;&#62;BjornB said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I have a parameter called 'Slide duration (sec)' in mine slideshow, isn't that the same. It's on the basic tab together with 'Variations'. 'Effects' and 'Background color'.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Yes, but I cannot type &#34;0 seconds&#34;.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I can use the slide show manually in version 2.0 by switching off this feature.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;http://www2.biologie.uni-halle.de/zool/coll/entomol/images/show2.jpg&#34; /&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#38;nbsp;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Cheers&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Joe&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>BjornB on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28883</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>BjornB</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28883@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-28832&#34;&#62;Joe said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What kind of manual controls do you miss now, exactly?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This one (from the german version 2.0):&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;http://www2.biologie.uni-halle.de/zool/coll/entomol/images/show.jpg&#34; /&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#38;nbsp;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Joe&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I have a parameter called 'Slide duration (sec)' in mine slideshow, isn't that the same. It's on the basic tab together with 'Variations'. 'Effects' and 'Background color'.&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>BjornB on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28882</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>BjornB</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28882@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-28877&#34;&#62;graydon said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Pull the slideshow stuff out and make an add-on... and give it a dedicated development / support team that can make it rock.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;And what good would that do? I have no idea why you have declared war against the slideshow but you must have your reason I assume. Why don't you just stop using it?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It works great for me and does what I need and expect it to do.&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>graydon on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28877</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>graydon</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28877@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I may be an antagonist on this one... but I'd just assume that ACDsee drop the slide show stuff completely from Pro.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I think it tends to bloat the code and isn't at the core of what Pro could be the best at...&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; getting, sorting / cataloging, viewing, and basic editing.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Pull the slideshow stuff out and make an add-on... and give it a dedicated development / support team that can make it rock.&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joe on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28832</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28832@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What kind of manual controls do you miss now, exactly?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This one (from the german version 2.0):&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;http://www2.biologie.uni-halle.de/zool/coll/entomol/images/show.jpg&#34; /&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#38;nbsp;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Joe&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>WPWoodJr on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28734</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>WPWoodJr</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28734@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-27944&#34;&#62;Pixiechild said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;You are absolutely right, the ability to jump between images is no longer available. We will look at adding similar functionality in future versions.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Erin&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Pixie, what do you mean?&#38;nbsp; I can still move back and forward in the slide show with the arrow and page up/down keys, and pause with &#34;p&#34;.&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tankred on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28702</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 10:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Tankred</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28702@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-28489&#34;&#62;Joe said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Removing of the manual control of the Slide Show was a great fault.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What kind of manual controls do you miss now, exactly?&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>wotan_odyn on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28691</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 09:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wotan_odyn</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28691@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Best Slideshow program I've used so far was MemoriesOnTv (http://www.codejam.com/). You can time everything to the second in it. But that's a specialised product and I don't suppose we can expect same kind of funcionality in ACDSee PhotoManager very soon. Unless ACDSee would just buy the CodeJam company? :-)&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joe on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28489</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28489@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;You are absolutely right, the ability to jump between images is no longer available. We will look at adding similar functionality in future versions.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Removing of the manual control of the Slide Show was a great fault.&#60;br /&#62;The Slide Show of ACDSee is useless now.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;:-( :-(&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Cheers&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Joe&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#38;nbsp;&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Erin on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28482</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28482@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Felix,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What video card do you have? Can you describe in more detail what you mean by shudder?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I tried to check out CompuPic Pro, unfortunately I can't get the Slide Show feature to run. Can you name some specific features you like about it?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Erin&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#38;nbsp;&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>FelixDaHousecat on "Slide Show feature worse than before in 2.5!  Now useless."</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/slide-show-feature-worse-than-before-in-25-now-useless#post-28318</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>FelixDaHousecat</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">28318@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Regardless of all the technical issues I have always been shocked at how poor the slide show feature is. It is so featureless and boring with poor transitions. Oh and by the way, my video card supports DirectX 9.0c and it shudders for me too.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;May I suggest that you look at how good the slide show feature in CompuPic Pro and try to imitate it!&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
