<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>ACDSee Forums Topic: Exposure Warnings</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</link>
<description>ACDSee Forums Topic: Exposure Warnings</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:15:13 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>Marc Sabatella on "Exposure Warnings"</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/exposure-warnings#post-16286</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Marc Sabatella</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16286@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Still present build 217.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sam Dring on "Exposure Warnings"</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/exposure-warnings#post-16059</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sam Dring</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16059@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Marc&#60;br /&#62;I now understand and agree that it is not reporting full whites or blacks (need to move 0 to 1) and, like you, I think it should
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marc Sabatella on "Exposure Warnings"</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/exposure-warnings#post-16047</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Marc Sabatella</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16047@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-17261&#34;&#62;samdring said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
I have read and re-read this bit of your post Marc and am still stumped.  For me, both exposure compensation and highlight control report clipped at 0 or 255 correctly.&#60;/p&#62;&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Perhaps it is a bug that I am seeing and others are not - something specific to Pentax RAW files, perhaps?  The behavior I see is the same whether using the original PEF or the converted DNG.  To be specific:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;1. Select RAW file&#60;br /&#62;2. Enter RAW processor&#60;br /&#62;3. Verify that &#38;quot;Clipped %&#38;quot; under &#38;quot;Highlights&#38;quot; reports 0 .00&#60;br /&#62;4. Crank up the Exposure control all the way to the right.  At this point, it should be *obviously* clipping like crazy - histogram all the way off to the right, and the entire picture turns white (or red if exposure warnings are on)&#60;br /&#62;5. For me, the &#38;quot;Clipped %&#38;quot; under Highlights remains at 0.00.  Do you see it reporting differently?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;On the other hand, I just noticed that if I reduce the &#38;quot;Highlights&#38;quot; value from 255 to 254, *then* the Clipped % reads as expected.  It starts at 0.00 if appropriate, and goes up as I turn up the Exposure.  It&#38;#39;s only when Highlights=255 that Clipped % remains at 0.00.  Does anyone else see this?  Does it seem correct?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sam Dring on "Exposure Warnings"</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/exposure-warnings#post-16041</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sam Dring</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">16041@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-17201&#34;&#62;Marc Sabatella said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
BTW, relevant to the topic *title*, if not the topic itself: I find it very counterintuitive that cranking up the exposure compensation in the RAW processor never reports &#38;quot;Clipped&#38;quot; pixels.  I guess that display is only for the &#38;quot;Highlights&#38;quot; control, and I suppose there may be a technical reason why this distinction exists.  But it isn&#38;#39;t obvious to me.&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;br /&#62;I have read and re-read this bit of your post Marc and am still stumped.  For me, both exposure compensation and highlight control report clipped at 0 or 255 correctly.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marc Sabatella on "Exposure Warnings"</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/exposure-warnings#post-15992</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Marc Sabatella</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15992@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-17192&#34;&#62;Chippy said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
Agree.That and the &#38;quot;Mouse over tips&#38;quot;&#60;br /&#62;Great idea Sam.&#60;br /&#62;My way of thinking, is to remove the icons from the toolbar altogether, and move them to a dropdown&#60;br /&#62;menu.&#60;br /&#62; I often wonder, how many users actually use it?&#60;/p&#62;&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Use which?  I certainly use exposure warnings.  I also use the mouseover tips (they don&#38;#39;t get in my way because I normally use the keyboard for as much as possible).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I don&#38;#39;t use the main toolbar, but I do rather like the context sensitive one.  Although I&#38;#39;d like it better if it were more customizable (or perhaps I haven&#38;#39;t tried hard enough).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;BTW, relevant to the topic *title*, if not the topic itself: I find it very counterintuitive that cranking up the exposure compensation in the RAW processor never reports &#38;quot;Clipped&#38;quot; pixels.  I guess that display is only for the &#38;quot;Highlights&#38;quot; control, and I suppose there may be a technical reason why this distinction exists.  But it isn&#38;#39;t obvious to me.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Chippy on "Exposure Warnings"</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/exposure-warnings#post-15986</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Chippy</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15986@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;&#60;p&#62;&#60;cite&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;#post-17182&#34;&#62;samdring said:&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/cite&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
Must be the most frequent problem which arises on this board.&#60;br /&#62;Could they not be auto-cancelled on re-starting the app?&#60;/p&#62;&#60;/blockquote&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Agree.That and the &#38;quot;Mouse over tips&#38;quot;&#60;br /&#62;Great idea Sam.&#60;br /&#62;My way of thinking, is to remove the icons from the toolbar altogether, and move them to a dropdown&#60;br /&#62;menu.&#60;br /&#62; I often wonder, how many users actually use it?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sam Dring on "Exposure Warnings"</title>
<link>http://community.acdsee.com/forums/topic/exposure-warnings#post-15980</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sam Dring</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15980@http://community.acdsee.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Must be the most frequent problem which arises on this board.&#60;br /&#62;Could they not be auto-cancelled on re-starting the app?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
